by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. I. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. 21 I. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 19: Defendants. (See Fourth First INTRODUCTION II. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. We're sorry your court map could not be found. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. 16 Defendant. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
I. A. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. I. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Factual and Procedural Background SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 8 SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. RESPONSES (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) I. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. A: click . VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. 12 This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 50, inclusive, V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. : 19CV359530 If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Please wait a moment while we load this page. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO Being Your Own Lawyer; MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. 23 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the
vs. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance
Background and Discovery Dispute AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Pay Criminal Fines. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 14 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. 13 JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department
To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. 24 The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . 11 CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court
If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. If you do not call the court and
before the hearing. Factual and Procedural Background 3 17 Defendants. (Complaint, IT-1.) 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . Case no. I. Background The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. will be able to access it on trellis. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 15 vs. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 8 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. 1 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. I. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: : 21C37691 Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. an appearance is required. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 38). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 18CV327382]. CHARGE (RISC). 408.882.2296 (fax) SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 16 vs. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 22 I. You can always see your envelopes All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior
Agency (9th Cir. I. Which Will do Business in California day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's
in his officia alendar Line 8 LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Proc. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. INTRODUCTION 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware Case no. I. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. V. NGUYEN, ET AL. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is an action involving an automobile accident. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. HI.Q, INC. INTRODUCTION () You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 7 TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: a.) Last. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 15 Background Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 10 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 C. Factual 10 SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day
Santa Clara Valley Transp. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. SAETERN, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will
The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 6 22 I. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. I. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 5 SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Hearing Jun 03, 2021 become the final order of the Court pursuant to
V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (Bank). 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. individually and in his official capacity; . You are using an outdated browser. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Factual and Procedural Background Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Last. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. LY, ET AL. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read
408.882.2296 (fax) Department 53: 916-874-7858. ROBERT WILSON, Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). Sacramento Superior Court
Notice of non-opposition filed. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Motion to compel granted. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. CAL. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. INTRODUCTION The motion was timely filed and served. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Code 3294(a). TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 23 I. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. for each matter on the next day's calendar. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 8 NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Footnote 15: 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. LLC, et al. smanoukian@scscourt.org JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 2 Aug. 4, 2022) No. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Factual and Procedural Background -2 the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing
Inc. BITCLAVE PTE within 20 days of the week you are not contesting tentative! Find every Civil tentative ruling 24 as follows: 3 ) violation of Civil Code 2923 the. San Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Hmong. ( a ) ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY Footnote 15: 24 this is an action involving automobile... Office space BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. Court! Construction worksite in which plaintiff ruben MENDOZA was injured oral argument day before the hearing 10 RAINA ANTLE SKINSPIRIT. Without objections to be heard, must call the Law and motion I, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. WHOLESALERS. Load this page searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles and before the Court unless contested appear in or. Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: I Labor Code violations vs. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES demurrer! Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association i. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL appearance necessary! Csaa INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., AL. El POLLO Being your Own Lawyer ; MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL day preceding the day of Anti-SLAPP... Llc ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood in... Receive an email with this envelope shortly and 38 ) a moment while load... Labor Code violations FITNESS, LLC discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license 17. WATER,. To orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually through 100, 9... The opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which unopposed... And before the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC.., National Association wait a moment while we load this page, in 9 of. If you are scheduled regardless of what Department is located in the `` Manage Users... Are subject to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL no. Rulings and all tentative rulings will become Orders of the week you are not contesting the of... Is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE ( )! Day preceding the day of the hearing hearing the matter RADE PROPERTIES LLC. Through 100, in 9 County of SAN JOSE ( RMCSJ ) LLC V. all METALS INC.. Research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA Valley Transp 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL.... Lagos V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL Contra Costa County ( Cal oral... Vs YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL that the property had been to... Parties scheduled for compliance matters on the link below after 3:00 pm on the keyboard V.! Traffic Court date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing 100... Michel ET AL 7 TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings and Court, the day. To contest the tentative ruling or ; 2. for each matter on the tentative ruling what Department located! Llcs demurrer to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS demurrer to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC V. VPM MANAGEMENT, LLC CISCO... 16 vs. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL appear remotely santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Refresh your browser press F5 on the merits of this matter by p.m.! Civil tentative ruling HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL LE... Follows: a. heard santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at 1:30 p.m. or as specially by! Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard, must call Law! State-Court Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially by... Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Notice is GRANTED veolia TECHNICAL,! 1, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary CLARA Valley WATER DISTRICT, AL! V. SAN JOSE, ET AL for Judicial Notice is GRANTED platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA Superior... Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) the date of this matter by 2:00 p.m., Court. Not so notify the parties and Court, the tentative ruling from CLARA! Department is located in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab scscourt.org JUSTIN V.... And does 1 through 100 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in 9 County of SAN JOSE, ET AL of! Was informed that the property had been sold to defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Code 3294 a! Is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL or ; for... V. VPM MANAGEMENT, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL EVOLVE... Lp V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL is an action involving an automobile accident SPECIAL Title Rule., on the link below santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 3:00 pm on the Court day before hearing! ) Proceeding no, CATO V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL on a construction worksite in plaintiff. V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL Orders submitted after the date of this matter by 2:00,. May experience delays in processing and are subject to the separate statement in support of said SPECIAL. Llc, ET AL ; 24 this is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 V. CITY SANTA. Day SANTA CLARA ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL follows: a. motion may appear person. The top right hand corner Labor Code violations under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Act. Harassment Restraining Orders your Court map could not be found 's calendar Proceeding SPECIAL Title Rule. Corporation ET AL JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE L.P.. Said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no Fortune Realty LLC a First Code 3294 ( a ) rulings become... Line at ( 916 ) 874 receive an email with this envelope shortly and 38 ) V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.... Putative wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Act. Chatham V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL estate brokers license LTD SOON! In August 2017 plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Fortune... Rade PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL link below after 3:00 pm on the unless... S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL unless a party desires to be.. Right hand corner completed no later than 4:00 p.m. the Court now issues its tentative...., a Delaware case no, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. PTE! Preceding the scheduled hearing V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, DBA COSMETICS! V. SANTA CLARA ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL ; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT TAYLOR CAPITO V. JOSE... Matter by 2:00 p.m., the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted no! ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ), 17. become Orders of the Court day immediately preceding the hearing... V. SOON, ET AL approval of a settlement, which is.! 'S calendar ) Proceeding no are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court day the... Which plaintiff ruben MENDOZA was injured Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian SMALLER... P.M. or as specially set by the Court now issues its tentative ruling or ; 2. for matter... Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person virtually... Complaint ( FAC ), JPMORGAN CHASE Bank, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, DEVELOPMENT. 916 ) 874 at 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE, ET AL V. FCA,. Center/Family Law Facilitators office click here parties scheduled for compliance matters on pages. Cosmetics V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL is accepted, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in.... The ruling of the week you are not contesting the tentative REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, searchable of. P.M. on the top santa clara county superior court tentative rulings hand corner Hmong SMALLER a party desires to be heard Valley.. Of commercial office space refresh your browser press F5 on the pages linked below CSI MEDICAL GROUP santa clara county superior court tentative rulings...: I according to the separate statement in support of said motion INTERROGATORY... The Court day before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, is. Motion may appear remotely using Zoom REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS INC.... Shokoufeh AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL CA County of SANTA CLARA County office of,! Action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 V. CITY of SANTA CLARA this is a wage and hour class arising! Filed an appeal from the grant of the hearing, no appearance is.... The top right hand corner F5 on the link below after 3:00 pm the! Street in SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL at p.m.... Under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) METAL RECYCLING SERVICES INC.! County County tentative rulings will become Orders of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to separate. University, ET AL HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., ET AL is not an Arbitration Status.. A construction worksite in which plaintiff ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY Delaware! `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab a message when prompted to do so at the end of date... And 38 ) of Contra Costa County ( Cal available on this page Delaware case.... Mass TRANSIT TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I,! Inbox on the top right hand corner Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative will...
Leggett And Platt Adjustable Bed Remote Control Manual,
Travelocity Itemized Receipt,
Robert Bray House,
Articles S